The blog says “It has, imho, a more intuitive UI and my user experience was better.” [compared to OsmAnd, which has no trackers according to Aurora].
Question of priorities, it seems.
Yes, I like Magic Earth and I’m using it when I need, but sometimes is difficult to find some places, thing that obviously gmaps can do better since it has the google search behind.
But I chose to not use it, gmaps I mean
Is Maps.Me the same as Magic Earth? I just looked up Magic Earth in the Aurora Store and it has “no trackers”. What am I missing? I have /e/ installed and I have been using Magic Earth.
The blog author chose Maps.ME for not having Google Maps, and for a certain user experience. Trackers or not played no role it seems.
/e/ chose Magic Earth as the stock maps App also for not having Google Maps, and for a certain user experience, with the additional benefit of apparently not having trackers.
@anon38440295 ideally wants to have basically Google Maps, but without the data collecting.
It seems Google got the user experience and the underlying data right, but excessively collects user data.
OsmAnd is the OpenStreetMaps App, has no trackers, but doesn’t get much love, apparently because it looks and works differently than Google Maps, and it has a ton of features and options which seem to be overkill for the average user.
Maps.ME simplifies the user experience while using OpenStreetMaps, but has trackers.
Magic Earth simplifies the user experience while using OpenStreetMaps, and has no trackers.
But it seems the underlying OpenStreetMaps data is still missing things compared to Google’s data.
OsmAnd~ has a 6/10 for Privacy in A, like Magic Earth. Both (and Maps.Me too, but Privacy N/A) are avalaible from F-Droid too. [OSM Dashboard for OpenTrack has a 10/10 for Privacy]Not the tool I was looking for…
Well, I’d never used any road-GPS with my phone, so I will test, but a good privacy focused one would be great… And low cellphone-datas would be better