Current critisicism about /e/ os

[Aelo]

Hey everyone, i don’t know if i am on the correct forum for posting this so don’t hesitate to move it.

On both the fairphone community forum and the /e/ os one i have found some commun critisicism.

They even have a list : https://divestos.org/misc/e.txt

Maybe this list can help /e/ os developpers for improvement ? Of course if they are true.

Whats your opinion on thi, specially on the webview security issues ?

Bien Cordialement.

[MRTN]

@Aelo

Whats your opinion on thi, specially on the webview security issues ?

My /e/ exit interview

We’re aware of this. The issue with the the WebView is due to the fact that we had some dev team reorg, and that there is someone else in charge of the Browser build, and it takes some time. It will be fixed in the coming weeks though. Same for PDFviewer, it will be updated soon and we’re improving our processes to avoid being trapped in such situations again in the future. That’s the reason why we need to grow the team, and for this we need more financial support too. Last but not least @Sk…

[tcecyk]

good list and reference point, but not every item on that list has the same weight. I personally don’t care about devices going EoL or the VoLTE stuff - you start out as an industry hostage when buying the device class.

browser/webview: if you follow the repo, it is getting some build automation that was missing to date. When it’s done I’d estimate the component not lagging on upstream anymore.