I think this article is biased, it states /e/ has limited range of devices, But compared to the other OSs it mentions there are hundreds more devices you can load /e/ on to!
That was an interesting article which concluded CalyxOS or GrapheneOS or CopperheadOS as recommendations. I personally see /e/ as a better OS than the rest of them.
It’s at least good that bloggers are writing about this stuff…glad to see more of that.
I can’t imagine why he included Copperhead in his final recommendation after just implying that it may not be actively developed (or secure) anymore. (And I don’t know enough to judge if that’s true or not.)
Also, SafetyNet is from Google. Why worry about the absence of that in an article about degoogled Android? 
“if you have a Google Pixel phone”…“CalyxOS or GrapheneOS or CopperheadOS. These Android ROMs have excellent features to help you keep your phone out of Google’s spying eyes”
Yeah? I hope he’s right. I’m glad those OS exist, but I myself don’t want a phone from Google.
I appreciate the author’s effort, but this article sort of reads like those “data privacy recommendations” that advise you to add a lock code to your screen and always get your apps from Google. 
This topic was automatically closed after 14 days. New replies are no longer allowed.