You’re really close but that’s not the correct answer 
1 Like
there is only one single mirror or other loop back device necessary to achieve this kind of results, nevertheless i don’t see this kind of “effects” as very satisfying in an artistic/creative sense.
take a look e.g. at works of mario klingemann if you want do get impression, how intellectual “reflection” of new means in electronic photography and image processing my lead to exiting new fields of artistic work.
1 Like
What’s the correct answer?
I never say it’s artistic. I have no pretention.
It’s just for fun and to start the photo event proposed by Elli.
Thanks for the reference to mario klingemann and no I didn’t use any mirror to do it.
2 Likes
Does someone maybe have an idea which mobile phone with e might deliver the best Photo/Video quality?
3 Likes
I want to know the exact same thing. We can fetch camera info from our device and post under the device section of this forum. example. I think it’s important the device supports RAW capture, then the foto camera app can process the RAW data into a picture.
1 Like
It’d depend more on the editing/processing than the phone, its almost 80% editing/processing & only 20% is the camera/hardware/phone/device for getting a good photo assuming you know the basics of photography ie stuff like controlling shaking hands when shooting. The thing that depends on hardware is resolution, lens specifications, etc… Regarding best phone for photo/video which is supported by /e/ its devices like Essential Phone, Pixel XL 2, LG G5, OnePlus 5 & 5T, Samsung Galaxy S7, S7 Edge, S9 & S9+, Xiaomi Mi 6, Mix 2 & 2s & Poco F1 mostly because they have the best ISP (image signal processor) which is found on the best SoC (system on chip) like Snapdragon 800 series & Samsung Exynos equivalents.
1 Like
no, i don’t think, we’ll get the significant information by this approach, because it’s very often caused by simple missconfigurations resp. necessary adaption efforts, that /e/ photo apps work worse than neccassary – i.e. can not find/use all cameras the phone etc.
for i long time i was thinking like you, and just wanted sufficient big sensels, good lenses and access to the RAW sensor data, to refine everything afterwards by wonderful tools like darktable, but recently i had to change my mind. many improvements concerning photography on mobile phones can not be reproduced by this traditional workflow. many of this machine learning based image processing techniques used in the best closed source apps available in this field right now, process synchronous input from multiple cameras and rather huge image sequences instead of just one single sensor readout. they often process an amount of image data, which could hardly written to an sdcard in realtime for later use by some kind of RAW processing software. and the results and capabilities of this class of apps (e.g. the research behind googles camera app) looks simply impressive. we therefore shouldn’t ignore them, just because there isn’t much similar powerful free open source camera software available till now.
1 Like
Yes, thats the thing. With an iPhone you get live bokeh in your viewfinder but when using Google Camera app on any phone including Google phones you don’t get that, its gonna be processed after you take the shot even though recent SoC used by android phones is more powerful than iPhone 7 Plus SoC which introduced this. The reality is that it can be written in realtime RAW but it requires better quality code which for now is not seen with only a few exceptions like in the case of the iPhone & actual camera. An actual camera has a SoC that can’t even match today’s budget phone SoC but they do a better job because its quality code & it only has a single purpose its kind of like an ASIC. The reason that I believe that editing/processing is 80% responsible for good photos is because I see the results from Google Camera app & its good just on its own but we can make it just as good if not better by editing/processing the photo on our own without using AI algorithms. The thing that Google is doing is making edits/processing the photo as a person would but using AI & its good enough that people consider it as beautiful so its sort of an automation like applying a premade filter but not just the same filter instead there are multiple filters for different scenarios which we can select. Regarding the portrait mode bokeh, the same result if not better can be achieved by editing/processing. In iPhone the bokeh is more realistic as the things that are near are less blurred than the things that are far but with Google Camera app it makes everything blurry to the point it feels fake if you know about photography enough & the blur is same for things that are close or far. Processing input from multiple camera & other things are better in nonfree apps which is a fact & can’t be ignored even though its probably because they don’t release camera software as Free software & instead keep it as nonfree which means using different camera app than the one that came with your device means you don’t get the same quality nor can you use multiple cameras, etc…
The first thing to get good pictures is the phone supporting RAW read from the phone, right? This app shows the support level. Then a really good app has to be made …
the information reported by this app may be very missleading.
on my xiaomi mi a1 it will not report the existence of all available cameras on this phone. sure, this could be as interpreted as an indicator, to argue, that this device isn’t supported very well by /e/. but in fact it isn’t very hard for users to workaround this limitations and make better use of the actual hardware by little modifications of the default setting. but again: your approach isn’t able to report and compare this actual possibilities.
this differences in the actual behavior could be very likely caused by patent claims, but i don’t see any technical reason, why it shouldn’t be handled just the same by other devices as well.
this particular application of ML looks rather trivial nowadays, just like the mentioned optimization by scene guessing and many other ‘cosmetic’ refinements.
but that’s not the kind of innovation, which i would see as really beneficial for serious photo work. more advanced noise reduction, useful enhancements of the achievable image resolution, correcting motion and lens distortions by ML techniques etc. on the other hand are rather useful although they may not sound very spectacular. that’s more the kind of progress and real improvement, which i would emphasize concerning this modern mobile camera apps.
1 Like
Hi guys!
Sorry; I’m a little late but here is how I took my picture:
First I started a /e/ device and took a photo of the booting screen.
Then I opened photo of booting screen. I took first phone (the one who booted) and opened OpenCamera. Finally I took Screenshot. Then I open Screenshot and opened opened OpenCamera and took another screenshot.
I repeat last step using all the phone I had at this moment.
2 Likes
The best camera phone i`ve, seen was the Nokia Lumia 925 and above tho sadly its a windows phone. It took amazing pictures and video even in low light thanks to its Carl Zeiss optics . Nokia are doing android now so maybe there hope and /e/ will support it.
This website lists the best camera phones for low light photography (here)
2 Likes
The new Nokia phones do have Carl Zeiss but don’t match to their predecessors because they haven’t been able to use the camera software that they had in Lumia because Microsoft owns that.
1 Like
I used one of the new Nokia’s for a little while before I I was completely released from the Goolag. 
The Nokia 8 Sirocco and yeah it had the dual lens Carl Zeiss optics but the camera when using the native camera app was terrible! It was significantly better when I installed a GCAM port, but still miles from an actual pixel phone. Definitely crippled by software… And its either really difficult or not possible at all to unlock android Nokia bootloaders at this stage so I cant see them getting /e/ for a while.
2 Likes
the list of reviews from dxo is also a rather reliable source of information:
https://www.dxomark.com/category/mobile-reviews/
but the results are always related to the original firmware and software refinements done by this devices. you shouldn’t expect similar satisfaying results under /e/ right now.
2 Likes
Thank you for that link.
As devices with e Elli posted a nice list above: “Essential Phone, Pixel XL 2, LG G5, OnePlus 5 & 5T, Samsung Galaxy S7, S7 Edge, S9 & S9+, Xiaomi Mi 6, Mix 2 & 2s & Poco F1”.
I only know two of these models, cannot comment on quality differences with e though or which one might be winner. I’d guess for normal everyday use all of them are good.
1 Like
Did someone maybe test a few of those models and can tell more about the device with the best photography experience on /e/?
Is it maybe the Samsung S9 or an other phone?