Feedback for v1.20

Vendor Name: Google
Device name: Pixel 4a5G
Device CodeName: bramble
Version of /e/OS: e-1.20-t-20240222382228-dev-bramblep
Version of e-Recovery: recovery-IMG-e-1.20-t-20240222382228-dev-bramble
Device is Not rooted


Pixel 4 (flame) Pixel 4a5G (bramble) Pixel 5 (redfin)
abl (1.0 MB) abl (1.0 MB) abl (1.0 MB)
aop (205 kB) aop (197 kB) aop (197 kB)
boot (67 MB) boot (101 MB) boot (101 MB)
devcfg (53 kB) devcfg (45 kB) devcfg (45 kB)
dtbo (8.4 MB) dtbo (17 MB) dtbo (17 MB)
n/a featenabler (90 kB) featenabler (90 kB)
hyp (528 kB) hyp (528 kB) hyp (414 kB)
keymaster (270 kB) keymaster (250 kB) keymaster (270 kB)
modem (85 MB) modem (153 MB) modem (85 MB)
product (619 MB) product (594 MB) product (619 MB)
qupfw (74 kB) qupfw (57 kB) qupfw (74 kB)
system (1.5 GB) system (1.5 GB) system (1.5 GB)
system_ext (442 MB) system_ext (473 MB) system_ext (442 MB)
tz (3.2 MB) tz (3.0 MB) tz (3.2 MB)
uefisecapp (127 kB) uefisecapp (127 kB) uefisecapp (127 kB)
vbmeta (4.1 kB) vbmeta (8.2 kB) vbmeta (4.1 kB)
vbmeta_system (4.1 kB) vbmeta_system (4.1 kB) vbmeta_system (4.1 kB)
vendor (905 MB) vendor (781 MB) vendor (905 MB)
n/a vendor_boot (101 MB) vendor_boot (101 MB)
xbl (3.4 MB) xbl (3.6 MB) xbl (3.4 MB)
______________________ ________________________ ______________________
Locking the bootloader No binding specification Locking the bootloader
/e/OS documentation /e/OS documentation /e/OS documentation

According to the /e/OS documentation, the bootloader can be locked again on the Google Pixel 4 (flame) and Pixel 5 (redfin) - but not on the Pixel 4a5G (bramble).

The /e/OS*.zip for the Pixel 4a5G (bramble) contains the same part structure / file name as the Pixel 5 (redfin). Nevertheless, the bootloader cannot be locked again according to the /e/OS documentation.

The /e/OS*.zip for the Pixel 4 (flame) does not contain two files (featenabler, vendor_boot), but according to /e/OS documentation the bootloader can still be relocked.

Questions

  1. Why can’t the bootloader be relocked on the Google Pixel 4a5G (bramble) with /eOS?

  2. Is it just a question of the /e/OS documentation, i.e. has it just been neglected to specify “Locking the bootloader” here as well or is it not possible for the /e/-dev-team to lock the bootloader again for technical reasons?