It is known that you must lift the lock āPrenormalā before you can flash the phone. (Official binaries excepted.)
Please read the whole post and updates by @corsicanu. He only tells us it is good for pie! Extract and open the .zip and read all the contents, and check that they will overwrite some lock that you can see is applied, Edit, better idea.
Here are 2 lines from the patch, much of the rest of the patch will try to harmonise /system
and /system/vendor
following that intrusion.
rm -rf /system/priv-app/Rlc 2>/dev/null
rm -rf /system/priv-app/KnoxGuard 2>/dev/null
I cannot tell you that Warranty void = 0 would survive that!
I say, better to ask Samsung first - they will know - then to look for the lock before such an intervention. At a minimum I would describe your situation and ask on the xda thread.
Please check again, but with Warranty Void = 0 the phone is still potentially returnable!
Later, also before an intervention that is not definitely specified for your device:
adb shell getprop
I suggest you search that command and tell me how far you can get on your own looking for locks.
to give up a tablet with a heavy heart.
If that includes a return you must not change Warranty Void = 0!
Edit - just one more thing is bugging me!
Apparently, the device was originally intended for France.
Please can you tell me how you deduced this? From Samsungās point of view, in that case, the intended market would surely have been EU? (Xiaomi require their devices on line for periods of 7, 14 days, or more. New generations of Samsung may be moving in that direction.)