Quite disappointed here : I’ve just bought a second-hand Samsung S7 because it is in the list of easy-installer Windows and Linux, but I don’t have Ubuntu, and you don’t provide any RPM of easy-installer !!!
That is not serious, because I’m sure you’ve got a RPM somewhere …
Can you tell me where I can find it ?
Thanks
Arch Linux
CentOS
Debian
elementary OS
Fedora
KDE Neon
Kubuntu
Manjaro
Linux Mint
openSUSE
Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Ubuntu (yes, that too)
Obviously they can’t win, because “I want [insert RPM or something else not covered here], or I want instructions for [insert Linux distribution not mentioned on the page here]” in 3 … 2 … 1 …
I understand selection of snap, but wonder would it require much work to offer also flatpak at flathub.
I won’t install snap myself, but on the other hand I like to use terminal. Still some would prefer flatpak and together with snap it would cover about all need for linux in easiest way.
I agree with you. I think it would really make sense to have Easy Installer available as Flatpak.
Only giving non-Ubuntu GNU/Linux users the choice between using snap or building from source is not the appropriate thing to do in my opinion, if you want /e/OS to reach more potential users.
Also, a presence on Flathub would be an additional way to advertise for /e/OS and Murena.
I’ve seen https://gitlab.e.foundation/e/backlog/-/issues/5545 and https://github.com/flathub/flathub/pull/3394 and I was wondering, what’s the status of this ? @nicofonk@GaelDuval
I totally agree. Flatpak is growing and gaining users, and would really enlarge the audience of the people “curious” about alternative mobile OS. Plus, people like me who don’t like to use Snap on Linux would have a choice
I agree as well. Snap is the worst of the distro agnostic packaging formats imo. Using Flatpak or AppImage makes a lot more sense to me. Probably Flatpak, since more people would find /e/ that way.