a question regarding audits/reviews of /e/: I am planning to email several well-known privacy auditors/reviewers, who regularly review apps for privacy, to invite them proactively to do a review/audit of /e/. I think this can only be positive:
if there is a positive of /e/, it will be good PR for /e/
if problems/issues are found, this will be useful information for the /e/ team and they can work to address these
I recently saw a video of chris titus (youtuber) where he tried out graphene os. It ended with the conclusion that there are some apps he just couldn’t part with (that dont run on graphene). It would be cool if we could get him to try out /e/ since its similar to graphene without actually restricting the user that much
No need to try to pin it on /e/ when I and some other users flag your posts for being spam, troll, etc
Another good example of the dishonnest meaning of your posts here.
@Andy1 Your posts are hidden because somebody flagged it. I can understand why. Your comments are often accusing, finger pointing, and non constructive. Why don’t you start your own topic with your concerns, in a polite way, maybe you get some answers. You are still here so you must be interested in the project… Yes /e/ isn’t perfect yet, but it’s a good start.