Thanks for all your controversial arguments. I’m just a regular phone user and don’t know much about specific risks. Saying that there are risks in all soft- and hardware, however, sounds like a poor argument. Wouldn’t that be like leaving all doors and windows open or unlocked, because an experienced burgler can get into the house anyway? I think as many obstacles as possible are better than none.
I’m pretty sensitive about my privacy, not using any social media/chat platform or email client except Threema, FairEmail and Ghostery, boycotting Amazon, Spottify, Netflix – you name it - additionally trying to protect my personal data with other solutions as best as I can. Those are some of the things besides my surfing behavior, I can control. What I, personally, have very limited control over is the operating system and the hardware I use. That means I have to rely on them to a high degree and to trust security and/or privacy promising developers, that they are using all means possible.
There are as many companies, institutions, secret services, totalitarian states, or bored/greedy individuals capable of gaining unauthorized access to our systems and data as there are reasons to use them, for profit, full control, blackmail, corruption and whatever. Thus it’s high time for a Europe-made Google-free OS! But what good would a Google freed OS be, if at the same time it’s opening backdoors?
Like I said, I’m a layman here, but if critics (although I don’t know how skilled they are) are pointing out that /e/OS might have security problems and there are no reassuring explanations on the foundation’s website, from the founder, or the development team, then … this makes me wonder if the decision whether to use /e/OS or Android is a choice between pest and cholera. Okay now, I may be exaggerating - what I’m trying to point out is, that this security topic should be communicated fair and square on the /e/OS website, because common sense tells me there’s no privacy without decent security.
Whether an unlocked boot is inevitable or not such a big deal after all, should be clarified in a convincing way and in simple words that everybody understands. If common Android patches are adopted and provided, I’d like to find this information on an official page. If device affecting patches are released, will there be respective patches available for e.g. Mureno phones, or is that obsolete, as those phones aren’t supported by manufacturers any more in the first place? In this respect the /e/OS and Mureno promotion in my very own humble opinion seems to be as improvable as any other cell phone advertising. Too little information for decision making.
Just one last remark: The most interesting privacy protecting Android alternatives I read about, are US based, i.e. I wouldn’t trust them in the long run. I think, /e/OS should proudly emphasize its origin and the GDPR.
BTW, here’s an article recommending /e/OS’s privacy protection: „Schlimmer als Google: Welche Daten alternative Android-Hersteller sammeln“