eOS "googled" version

/e/OS Smartphone Operating System
22

May I ask you an off topic question ?

How much mobile phone do you have lost or where stolen ??

2 Likes
23

It’s not about me. It’s about /e/ users.

1 Like
24

With Windows, the comparison is incorrect at all! Compare with stock firmware and pedigree. lineage os philosophy give new life to old devices, for enthusiasts! Well-known smartphone manufacturers pay a lot of money for finding holes in their firmware. A / e / sells phones under such a promising motto, with such a vulnerability, without warning customers! And by the way, those who respect themselves and other creators of firmware based on the OS line, indicate something like this:
special thanks
AOSP
Lineage os
here are the names of the developers
And all other open source software-developers, teams, and organizations
DM if we missed someone - you can always look at GitHub to find more

1 Like
25

I think the chance that a hacker will steel or find your device and will sell your data / identity is much lower than gotten hit by a thounder.

2 Likes
26

That’s not an /e/ related problem, any person’s device will be like that, who likes playing with different roms!
Besides, just get a phone with relockable bootloader if you don’t want to carrying yours with unlocked everywhere.

27

/e/ sells phones, that makes /e/ responsible right? Besides in the howto’s should be a warning that if you don’t encrypt, pin and fingerprint are fake safety measures.

1 Like
28

I didn’t say it was ok, that’s why I said :

By the way I have myself asked questions about the security in the case somebody has the phone in this topic months ago :

1 Like
29

For me, there is no sense in the reGoogled /e/ version. There are other roms that can do that. There is a purpose in the /e/ project. I think it is better to advertise /e/ as a more secure smartphone and teach peaople that it matters, than move a lot of development time to deliver next android that already there…

7 Likes
30

I agree, it isn’t completely ungoogled yet, that is the first goal: leaving Google completely. For example “Contacts” app still seems to be Google. When you go in to “Contacts > menu (typical Google hamburger icon above left) > about contacts > privacy policy” your default browser shows the Google privacy policy webpage.
The same thing happens in “Contacts > menu (typical Google hamburger icon above left) > about contacts > Terms of service” your default browser opens the Google terms of service webpage.
What is the com.android.contacts app? Google open source. There is still some ungoogling to do before the /e/ version 1.0 with a new name comes out.
Lets face it, Android is built by Google on a Linux kernel, to have a phone that is completely free of Google or Apple: buy a pure Linux phone.
/e/ is already easy to use, it is easy to install most of the G00gl stuff on it if you want to, so I really don’t see any reason to start “reGoogling” now. Let’s try to “unGoogle” it further!

4 Likes
31

Completely agree with @pjmbraet

4 Likes
32

About Contact : +1000 !!!

That’s why I tried to split my /e/phone (nougat) :

  • Contact with just phone numbers,
  • no international (+33) nor webmail adress,
  • Shelter for webbrowsers,
  • no call/SMS/mail during web use,
  • no background data’s allowed anywhere…
    (no GPS, no cloud, no sync…)

Cause alternatives to Contact don’t work fine with Silence, phone… and it’s pretty difficult to really turn off this app.

33

What a strange idea !!

1 Like
35

Totaly desagree on a non-100%-FOSS /e/ version; expect anyhow that the non-FOSS parts/components will be clearly described/defined.

36

This topic was automatically closed 15 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.