Another major step to v2.0 which performs quite poorly regarding battery usage - there are only three versions with lower lasting so far.
It appears a pattern showing up: from the start of measuring by v1.7 there were three versions worse, then a good one (1.11). Again three worse, then a good one (1.15), three worse, then a good one (1.19).
So, maybe battery life might recover by 2.1 if number magic does help.
Here are the graphs:
As I mentioned, I’m always installing the RCs (anyway I do NOT install alphas and betas), which are altering the graphical picture, as the the overall length of the install time differs from my method.
So I have altered the calculatory basis and now can show how it might look for someone who only upgraded the OS without other changes:
