Feedback for v1.12.3

Regarding Seek and Tesla just mentioned above. This may fit with a difference between “GPS from the device” and a thing which seems odd to me; the app may acquire “GPS though Google Play Services” as this is a feature highlighted to app developers – the thought being that a Google phone can deliver this more efficiently than rely on the device sourced GPS.

It seems from my reading that micro-G may well handle “GPS though Google Play Services” just fine (mostly !).

Hi,
for me nothing works well with Seek.
iNaturalist works well but the Seek app does not.
More, it crash when I try to enter the location with the last updated version (2.14.10 on my S9+).
I tried with and without GPS with the same results.

The only time I’ve found that Seek crashes is when trying (with location enabled) to access a page which contains a map, for example an individual recorded observation.

Otherwise it all seems to work OK, it determines location correctly and includes this information when saving a record.

Did you need “Lenovo Smart & Rescue Assistant”?
It’s only supported for Windows…
Made some prep on my Linux, but need to fully understand this concept before commencing.
Did you ran the remove dm verity?

Thanks

Oneplus
Oneplus 8 (IN2013)
instantnoodle
From Stock OxygenOS 12.1 IN2013_11_C.36
not rooted

No touch screen. Cannot do anything once flash complet

Perhaps you can find something here …

Vendor Name: Google

Device name: Pixel 4a

Device CodeName: sunfish

Version of /e/OS or Stock which existed previously: /e/ 1.11 “S” DEV
note: Stable R with factory android 11 modem only works with Edge on Mint/T-Mobile, no LTE. S Dev works with LTE on factory android 12 modem with Mint/T-Mobile USA.

Is the device Rooted / **Not rooted**: NOT rooted

install was flawless. Phone works… except MMS broke with update (worked with 1.11 S Dev) reset and re-entered APN for Mint Mobile (T-Mobile mvno). Stock messenger not working. Also Google messenger has same issues. regular texting works, can not send it receive any pic attachments - fail to send on my end.

/e/ OS version 1.12.3-s-20230617300623-dev-sunfish.

Update 07 July 2023, Still no go, What was done:

factory reset /e/ , manually re-flashed 1.12.3-s-20230628304336-dev-sunfish
set APN again (same as what works on a second factory google Pixel 4a android 13 known/proven functional)
used stock Messenger, also installed and tested SMS Messenger from F-Droid - both send SMS, fail on MMS

APN Settings located at https://www.mintmobile.com/help/how-to-configure-android-settings/

Captured logcat when trying to send an MMS from the /e/ stock messenger

07-07 10:34:32.939 2714 5962 D TelephonyProvider: match current APN size: 2
07-07 10:34:32.939 2714 2714 D PhoneSwitcherNetworkRequstListener: got request NetworkRequest [ REQUEST id=136, [ Transports: CELLULAR Capabilities: MMS&NOT_RESTRICTED&TRUSTED&NOT_VPN Specifier: <TelephonyNetworkSpecifier [mSubId = 2]> Uid: 1001 RequestorUid: 1001 RequestorPkg: com.android.mms.service] ]
07-07 10:34:32.939 2714 5962 D TelephonyProvider: match MVNO APN: 1
07-07 10:34:32.939 2714 5962 D TelephonyProvider: match carrier id APN: 0
07-07 10:34:32.940 2714 5962 I MmsService: [SendRequest@ec6d7ca {x-message-id:0}] No match with APN name: Wholesale, try with no name
07-07 10:34:32.940 2714 5962 I MmsService: [SendRequest@ec6d7ca {x-message-id:0}] Loading APN using name null
07-07 10:34:32.940 2714 5962 D TelephonyProvider: Using old permission behavior for telephony provider compat
07-07 10:34:32.946 2714 5962 D TelephonyProvider: match current APN size: 34
07-07 10:34:32.947 2714 5962 D TelephonyProvider: match MVNO APN: 1
07-07 10:34:32.947 2714 5962 D TelephonyProvider: match carrier id APN: 0
07-07 10:34:32.948 2714 5962 D MmsService: [SendRequest@ec6d7ca {x-message-id:0}] MmsNetworkManager: release, count=0
07-07 10:34:32.948 2714 5962 E MmsService: [SendRequest@ec6d7ca {x-message-id:0}] APN failure
07-07 10:34:32.948 2714 5962 E MmsService: com.android.mms.service.exception.ApnException: Can not find valid APN
07-07 10:34:32.948 2714 5962 E MmsService: at com.android.mms.service.ApnSettings.load(ApnSettings.java:116)
07-07 10:34:32.948 2714 5962 E MmsService: at com.android.mms.service.MmsRequest.execute(MmsRequest.java:213)
07-07 10:34:32.948 2714 5962 E MmsService: at com.android.mms.service.MmsService$2.run(MmsService.java:581)
07-07 10:34:32.948 2714 5962 E MmsService: at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1167)
07-07 10:34:32.948 2714 5962 E MmsService: at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:641)
07-07 10:34:32.948 2714 5962 E MmsService: at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:920)
07-07 10:34:32.948 1663 2239 D ConnectivityService: releasing NetworkRequest [ REQUEST id=136, [ Transports: CELLULAR Capabilities: MMS&NOT_RESTRICTED&TRUSTED&NOT_VPN Specifier: <TelephonyNetworkSpecifier [mSubId = 2]> Uid: 1001 RequestorUid: 1001 RequestorPkg: com.android.mms.service] ] (release request)
07-07 10:34:32.950 2714 5962 I MmsService: [SendRequest@ec6d7ca {x-message-id:0}] processResult: failure(2) handledByCarrierApp: false mLastConnectionFailure: 0
07-07 10:34:32.950 2714 5962 I MmsService: [SendRequest@ec6d7ca {x-message-id:0}] MMS failed with error: 2 httpStatus:0
07-07 10:34:32.953 2714 5962 D MmsService: addToRunningRequestQueueSynchronized mRunningRequestCount=0
07-07 10:34:32.953 2714 5962 D MmsService: Move pending requests to running queue mPendingSimRequestQueue.size=0
07-07 10:34:32.953 4412 4412 V MmsSentReceiver: MMS sending result: 2
07-07 10:34:32.953 4412 4412 V MmsSentReceiver: content://mms/10
07-07 10:34:32.953 4412 4412 V MmsSentReceiver: MMS has failed to send, marking it as so in the database
07-07 10:34:32.956 966 966 I netd : networkSetPermissionForNetwork(100, 1) <7.03ms>

I have to add: After restarting the mobile phone, app permissions are resetted again. VPN permission has to be given again as well as installation permissions for F-Droid

Hi all,

Since v1.12.3 that I installed a week ago on my FP4 (1.12.3-s-20230615299639-stable-FP4) I find often that when I charge the phone before night, unplug it at 100%, put it in flight mode and open it in the morning the battery has lost 1.6%/h. Here are BetterBatteryStats reports that seem to indicate wakelocks activity but I’m not sure how to interpret them. Could anyone help? Thanks in advance.




What stands out for me from you log is

I MmsService: ... No match with APN name: Wholesale, try with no name
E MmsService: [SendRequest@ec6d7ca {x-message-id:0}] APN failure
E MmsService: com.android.mms.service.exception.ApnException: Can not find valid APN

The leading I is for Info; E is for Error.

So it seems the published APN contain an error. Other threads on the forum on the subject have the hashtag apn ← is a link !

There was a recent forum thread, Can't remove an APN from previous carrier, causing SMS failures where the published ANP worked with errors, but in the end on contacting the carrier, a slightly different APN was offered which fixed the problem.

I think contact your carrier is the way forward.

I saw that too - what I do not get - why does the pixel 4a on stock android not have the issue with the same sim card and APN settings. My wife dropped her 4a so I upgraded her phone and later replaced the screen and digitizer - hence I have 2 pixel 4a’s. I switch the sim between the /e/ 4a and the complete factory 4a. this way i also don’t have to stress if a flash doesnt go as planned and I can take it up the next day. there is definitely something off, especially since the /e/ phone used to send pics in texts (work stuff, and stuff to my wife). at this time I am in the Stock Google phone until I can address the issue.

I am sure the APN settings are changed since I formatted, downgraded to /e/ 1.11 s dev, took the online update, then reinstalled the SIM and APN settings

I think the linked thread shows some of the complexity of the issue, with a much more detailed technical explanation. (I did not fully check the detail, but I thought there was a high chance you were in a similar position although detail of your case is different).

Loosely speaking, I believe evolving technology is causing carriers to make changes to APN more often than previously. I think that with the cooperation of Google these changes can now be made on the fly, but at the moment it seems from cases reported like yours and the linked thread that part does not happen in /e/OS. /s/OS, being AOSP, gets its APN in the way described more fully below.

This is mostly a response to “it doesn’t happen on my regular Google phone” – the main part of your post, as I read it :slightly_smiling_face:

I find this argument hard to answer because I just don’t want a system owned by an advertising agency running my phone. I will do any amount of adjustments that are required – as the /e/ solution seems easier than a Pinephone and cheaper than Librem.

So, as @cornfarmer found, a call to the carrier may be the answer. As the simple response.

I had not covered this part of your question.

It seems the case that on an update (some or all phones ? * ) receive an update of the /e/ “catalogue” of APN. Here is the link at branch v-1-s https://gitlab.e.foundation/e/os/android_vendor_lineage/-/blob/v1-s/prebuilt/common/etc/apns-conf.xml?ref_type=heads. That is current.

Study of the commit history https://gitlab.e.foundation/e/os/android_vendor_lineage/-/commits/v1-s?ref_type=heads would reveal if a change, in the case of your carrier, had happened since the date of your e-1.11-s build.

And / or I am not clear if perhaps you felt an edit you made to your APN was overwritten by the update?

When one knows a supplied APN is wrong it might be better to Add your corrected APN, in case it could happen than an APN (Edited by a user) is overwritten by an update.
Edit With the timing of your

  • install,
  • adding APN,
  • update to 1.12.3

I see that this is probably not advice pertinent to your situation, more general advice ! :slight_smile:

* Edit 2. I used to think that update of apns-conf.xml happened at Android version upgrade. It looks from recent activity that apns-conf.xml may be updated at every update – would anyone confirm this.

Edit 3
In your Mint “advised” APN link we see

MCC – (do not change default values)
MNC – (do not change default values)
MMSC – http://wholesale.mmsmvno.com/mms/wapenc

in apns-conf.xml, mmsc="http://wholesale.mmsmvno.com/mms/wapenc" occurs < 10 times, but I do not see it associated with what I recognise as the T-mobile mcc which I thought was "204"

@roadrunner4spd, to help to see if there is a case that we should submit a request to add or change any T-mobile entry in apns-conf.xml please can you confirm the
mcc="xxx" mnc="xxx"
you use.

For further reference https://source.android.com/docs/core/connect/update This demonstrates the method of update of APN in AOSP – which is implied different from the method used in a Google phone (as “on the fly”)

1 Like

Returning with an update on performance. I am consistently waking up to 85% batteries after overnight charging. See battery graph:

Performance is still abysmal memory-wise. My Teracube 2e only has 3.8 GB of RAM, and it hovers around 3.1 GB on average! When I go to look at what could be eating this much, I see the Android OS is taking up an entire GB of memory…


Like I said in my previous post, none of this was an issue on 1.11. This performance is concerning to me. I feel like I’m trying to wade through molasses every time I try to do something on my phone. I would appreciate any advice or ETAs on a fix.

I have no real insights to your issue but that battery graph is super strange. It says you are at 90% but with only 16 minutes left!? Wow. And then there are ups and downs. That should not be as you figured.
Once fully charged, and if ROM properly resets stats, it should be a steady (or drastic) decline but there should be no ups at all. Rises implies periodic charging. If you were not constantly charging your phone then something is definitely wrong.

It will also be hard to determine actual battery usage of apps.

Oops. Had to totally re-edit this. Mistakenly commented on Android OS and battery usage. :upside_down_face:

As far as memory usage of Android OS goes, that’s not a problem.
Android OS is always at the top of memory usage. In my case anyway.
crDroid A11, OnePlus 8T - 1.8GB.
/e/OS A11, Teracube emerald, 1.2GB.
Havoc OS A9, Moto G5 Plus, 0.96GB.
FireHound A8, Moto G5s Plus, 806MB.
/e/OS A10, Essential PH-1 mata, 1.0GB.
LeOS-R A11, Essential PH-1 mata, 0.97GB.

So your 1GB is not abnormal.

1 Like

Hi everybody. Thanks for all your feedback on this version as it has been very helpful.

One quick question to confirm something. Can I take a pass on this update and go from 1.11 to whatever is after 12.3 straight without having to update to 12.3?

1.11 has been the first time for me where I don’t have a battery drain some of the time and have had no other minor issues, so not in a hurry to leave 1.11

Plus I am seeing quite a bit of feedback in this thread that is making me nervous about moving to 12.3 when everything on my FP4 is working perfectly at the moment.

Really appreciate all the work form the e team and all your feedback!

Thanks in advance!

Yes you can, there is no need and you can update to any future version

2 Likes

Thanks! Appreciate the quick response.

As far as memory usage of Android OS goes, that’s not a problem.
Android OS is always at the top of memory usage. In my case anyway.
…So your 1GB is not abnormal.

That’s really interesting… Maybe I have to look elsewhere for the issue. I never paid much attention to how much memory my apps were eating in the previous update because I felt no need to, so maybe my Android OS was still using 1GB in 1.11.

And the bliss pbm of icons reorganization is back. Two reorganizations with no icons on the directt launching (bottom of the screen).
It seems that for the 2 last updates the bug is back.

1 Like

Yes, it’s true the launcher rearranges icons itself.